Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 05:13:12PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> Sure.. however for Enterprise stuff... there are different >> expectations for what is wanted than the latest and greatest. I was >> trying to get some discussion before people start having to fix the >> engines after the airplane is in the air.. > > I agree that it's essential to stop the free-for-all package churn that > Extras goes through. It's pretty impressive, but an enterprise extras > can't have 100+ packages updating every week. Offhand, I couldn't disagree more. You mean you'd rather live with the bugs that those 100+ package updates fix? No thanks. If you don't want the churn, then don't update your el4 boxen. -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
