On 9/15/06, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/15/06, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > I would like to suggest the following plan for Enterprise Extras:
> >
> > 1) There are 4 channels per {Scientific/Centos} Enterprise Linux
> > extras
> > extras-devel
> > extras-testing
> > extras-updates
>
> Frankly, *way* too much complexity here. Heck, we don't even have
> a -testing repo for FE yet. When/if we figure out -testing for *all* of
> Extras, then EE will naturally benefit from it as well.
>
+1
This project will take off or it won't, we should probably let items
like this mature on their own as time goes on and the need for them
becomes more apparent. No need to add overhead to something that
doesn't even exist yet ;-)
Sure.. however for Enterprise stuff... there are different
expectations for what is wanted than the latest and greatest. I was
trying to get some discussion before people start having to fix the
engines after the airplane is in the air..
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
