Fedora Extras
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Permanent page reference for packages
- From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: Permanent page reference for packages
- Re: Extras for FC6 rebuild status
- Re: Extras for FC6 rebuild status
- Extras for FC6 rebuild status
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-25
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-09-25
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-25
- Re: mimetype icon installation help needed
- Re: pan orphaned - willing to volunteer for maintainership
- Re: Permanent page reference for packages
- From: Konstantin Ryabitsev
- Re: Permanent page reference for packages
- Re: mimetype icon installation help needed
- man page sections
- Re: Permanent page reference for packages
- Re: Permanent page reference for packages
- Re: rpms/gnome-yum/devel .cvsignore,1.5,1.6 sources,1.5,1.6
- Re: Permanent page reference for packages
- Re: Permanent page reference for packages
- Re: Permanent page reference for packages
- Re: Permanent page reference for packages
- Re: Handling optional package requirements
- Re: Permanent page reference for packages
- Re: Permanent page reference for packages
- Handling optional package requirements
- compiz manager
- Permanent page reference for packages
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Packages in need of a rebuild just before the release.
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- Re: pan orphaned - willing to volunteer for maintainership
- Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- mimetype icon installation help needed
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- pan orphaned - willing to volunteer for maintainership
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-24
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-09-24
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-24
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)
- Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=
- Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=
- Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=
- rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=
- Re: Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-23
- Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-23
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- Re: Packages with dependencies to removed mass-rebuild ones
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- List of inactive members in cvsextras that will be removed soon
- Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-23
- Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23
- Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-23
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-23
- Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-09-23
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-23
- Re: Packages with dependencies to removed mass-rebuild ones
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-15
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Packages with dependencies to removed mass-rebuild ones
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Packages with dependencies to removed mass-rebuild ones
- Re: Packages with dependencies to removed mass-rebuild ones
- Re: Packages with dependencies to removed mass-rebuild ones
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Packages with dependencies to removed mass-rebuild ones
- Re: Packages with dependencies to removed mass-rebuild ones
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-15
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-15
- Re: Packages with dependencies to removed mass-rebuild ones
- Packages with dependencies to removed mass-rebuild ones
- Re: FE Package Status of Sep 21, 2006
- Re: Orphaning 'mantis' (Web-based bugtracking system)
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-21
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- General notes about mass rebuild fallout status
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-09-21
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-21
- Re: FE Package Status of Sep 21, 2006
- Re: gcc-c++ broken on build system?
- gcc-c++ broken on build system?
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: FE Package Status of Sep 21, 2006
- Re: Orphaning 'mantis' (Web-based bugtracking system)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- FE Package Status of Sep 21, 2006
- Re: Orphaning 'mantis' (Web-based bugtracking system)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- Re: Orphaning 'mantis' (Web-based bugtracking system)
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Final release notes deadline - 23 Sep Wiki freeze
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: arch: needs.rebuild removed, but no new packages in the repo (Was: Re: Updated list)
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-20
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-09-20
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-20
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: rpms/gnet2/devel gnet2.spec,1.7,1.8 needs.rebuild,1.1,NONE
- Re: Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Re: rpms/gnet2/devel gnet2.spec,1.7,1.8 needs.rebuild,1.1,NONE
- [Fwd: Release Notes freeze for FC6]
- Re: txukart -> supertuxkart, new package?
- Re: txukart -> supertuxkart, new package?
- Re: txukart -> supertuxkart, new package?
- Re: tuxkart -> supertuxkart, new package?
- Re: txukart -> supertuxkart, new package?
- Re: txukart -> supertuxkart, new package?
- txukart -> supertuxkart, new package?
- Re: Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Re: Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Re: Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Re: Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Re: inactive extras contributors in cvsextras
- Re: Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Re: automatic way to determine non-legacy branches?
- Fwd: Re: tetex-prosper package in Fedora Extras
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: In respect of your Fedora packages
- Re: Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Re: Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-19
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Re: Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-09-19
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-19
- Re: Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Re: Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Packages removed from FE devel repo 2006-09-19
- Re: inactive extras contributors in cvsextras
- Re: inactive extras contributors in cvsextras
- Re: Mock and the [groups] files
- Re: add FE-Legal to ReviewGuidelines
- Re: inactive extras contributors in cvsextras
- Re: automatic way to determine non-legacy branches?
- Re: inactive extras contributors in cvsextras
- Re: inactive extras contributors in cvsextras
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: inactive extras contributors in cvsextras
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: inactive extras contributors in cvsextras
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: inactive extras contributors in cvsextras (was Re: librsync orphaned)
- inactive extras contributors in cvsextras (was Re: librsync orphaned)
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: rpms/Gtk-Perl/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Gtk-Perl.spec, 1.5, NONE Makefile, 1.1, NONE filter-depends.sh, 1.1, NONE needs.rebuild, 1.1, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE
- Re: automatic way to determine non-legacy branches?
- Re: librsync orphaned
- Re: Problem with Kadu themes
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: librsync orphaned
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: librsync orphaned
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: rpms/Gtk-Perl/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Gtk-Perl.spec, 1.5, NONE Makefile, 1.1, NONE filter-depends.sh, 1.1, NONE needs.rebuild, 1.1, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE
- Re: librsync orphaned
- Re: librsync orphaned
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- [Bug 167034] Review Request: foremost -- Recover files by "carving" them from a disk image
- Re: librsync orphaned
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- lft (was: rpms/Gtk-Perl/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Gtk-Perl.spec, 1.5, NONE Makefile, 1.1, NONE filter-depends.sh, 1.1, NONE needs.rebuild, 1.1, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: rpms/Gtk-Perl/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Gtk-Perl.spec, 1.5, NONE Makefile, 1.1, NONE filter-depends.sh, 1.1, NONE needs.rebuild, 1.1, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE
- Re: rpms/Gtk-Perl/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Gtk-Perl.spec, 1.5, NONE Makefile, 1.1, NONE filter-depends.sh, 1.1, NONE needs.rebuild, 1.1, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE
- Re: Mock and the [groups] files
- Re: librsync orphaned
- Re: Problem with Kadu themes
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Mock and the [groups] files
- Re: librsync orphaned
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- automatic way to determine non-legacy branches?
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Transaction Check Error
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-18
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-18
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Re: arch: needs.rebuild removed, but no new packages in the repo (Was: Re: Updated list)
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-18
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-09-18
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- Extras packages queued for removal after (non-)rebuild
- librsync orphaned
- Mock and the [groups] files
- Re: Cyrus IMAP
- Re: Problem with Kadu themes
- Re: Problem with Kadu themes
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- FESCo Meeting Minutes 2006-09-14
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: arch: needs.rebuild removed, but no new packages in the repo (Was: Re: Updated list)
- libuninameslist orphaned
- Problem with Kadu themes
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: .py* permissions opinions?
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: arch: needs.rebuild removed, but no new packages in the repo (Was: Re: Updated list)
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: rpms/graphviz/devel graphviz.spec,1.26,1.27
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cyrus IMAP
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Brasero - burning software for GNOME
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cyrus IMAP
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Brasero - burning software for GNOME
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- arch: needs.rebuild removed, but no new packages in the repo (Was: Re: Updated list)
- Re: rpms/stratagus/devel stratagus--configure-libs.diff, NONE, 1.1 stratagus--configure_in-libs.diff, NONE, 1.1 stratagus.spec, 1.8, 1.9
- Updated list: Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: .py* permissions opinions?
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: Cross-compilers. (resend)
- Re: .py* permissions opinions?
- Re: rpms/graphviz/devel graphviz.spec,1.26,1.27
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- .py* permissions opinions?
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- wine (Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-17)
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-17
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-09-17
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-17
- Re: extras-buildsys/utils extras-repomanage.py, NONE, 1.1 extras-repobuild.py, 1.24, 1.25
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: Cross-compilers.
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: leafnode maintainer AWOL
- Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package
- Re: Fw: Build Error (Job 17645): sblim-wbemcli-1_5_1-1_fc5 on fedora-development-extras
- Re: Fw: Build Error (Job 17645): sblim-wbemcli-1_5_1-1_fc5 on fedora-development-extras
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Fw: Build Error (Job 17645): sblim-wbemcli-1_5_1-1_fc5 on fedora-development-extras
- Re: ldconfig and %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so files
- Re: ldconfig and %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so files
- Fw: Build Error (Job 17645): sblim-wbemcli-1_5_1-1_fc5 on fedora-development-extras
- Re: ldconfig and %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so files
- Re: ldconfig and %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so files
- Re: ldconfig and %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so files
- ldconfig and %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so files
- Re: mono problem on the buildsys for ppc (rawhide)?
- Re: mono problem on the buildsys for ppc (rawhide)?
- Re: Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- Re: Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- Re: Some bad news (well.. maybe)
- Re: Invalid/ignored FE builds 2006-09-16
- mono problem on the buildsys for ppc (rawhide)?
- Re: build problem for x86_64
- Re: build problem for x86_64
- Re: Some bad news (well.. maybe)
- Re: Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- Re: build problem for x86_64
- Re: build problem for x86_64
- Re: build problem for x86_64
- Re: Some bad news (well.. maybe)
- Invalid Branch Requests and Invalid Rebuilds
- Re: Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- Re: build problem for x86_64
- Re: build problem for x86_64
- Re: build problem for x86_64
- Re: Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- build problem for x86_64
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- Re: rpms/nautilus-sendto/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, NONE needs.rebuild, 1.1, NONE
- Re: Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- Re: Some bad news (well.. maybe)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: leafnode maintainer AWOL
- Invalid/ignored FE builds 2006-09-16
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-16
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-09-16
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-16
- Re: rpms/nautilus-sendto/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, NONE needs.rebuild, 1.1, NONE
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- Re: Some bad news (well.. maybe)
- Re: Some bad news (well.. maybe)
- leafnode maintainer AWOL
- Re: Some bad news (well.. maybe)
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Some bad news (well.. maybe)
- Re: Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-15
- Cyrus IMAP
- From: hv @ Fashion Content
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-15
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-15
- Re: Add czech-support group to FE comps
- Re: Need help with cvsextras account
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-15
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-15
- Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-15
- Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-09-15
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-15
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-15
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-15
- Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-15
- Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-15
- Need help with cvsextras account
- Add czech-support group to FE comps
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-15
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Fw: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: rpms/system-switch-im/devel im-switch, 1.1, NONE needs.rebuild, 1.1, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE system-switch-im.spec, 1.2, NONE
- Re: Reminder: rebuild your FE packages for FC6 *by the end of this week*
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Reminder: rebuild your FE packages for FC6 *by the end of this week*
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: rpms/system-switch-im/devel im-switch, 1.1, NONE needs.rebuild, 1.1, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE system-switch-im.spec, 1.2, NONE
- Re: Reminder: rebuild your FE packages for FC6 *by the end of this week*
- Re: Reminder: rebuild your FE packages for FC6 *by the end of this week*
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Reminder: rebuild your FE packages for FC6 *by the end of this week*
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: openmpi
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Reminder: rebuild your FE packages for FC6 *by the end of this week*
- Re: Reminder: rebuild your FE packages for FC6 *by the end of this week*
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-14
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6
- Re: openmpi
- Re: Reminder: rebuild your FE packages for FC6 *by the end of this week*
- Re: Reminder: rebuild your FE packages for FC6 *by the end of this week*
- Re: Reminder: rebuild your FE packages for FC6 *by the end of this week*
- Reminder: rebuild your FE packages for FC6 *by the end of this week*
- Re: Problems with the build system
- Re: openmpi
- Re: rpmlint incorrect-locale-sv message
- Re: Problems with the build system
- Re: Removal of xcin and libtabe
- Problems with the build system
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- FE Package Status of Sep 14, 2006
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Removal of libtabe.
- Removal of xcin.
- Re: rpmlint incorrect-locale-sv message
- Self-Introduction: Peter Gordon
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: rpmlint incorrect-locale-sv message
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- rpmlint incorrect-locale-sv message
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: openmpi
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: openmpi
- From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: openmpi
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- Re: Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Would like to import CORE into Fedora (naming problem)
- Re: Buildsys problem
- Re: Buildsys problem
- Buildsys problem
- Re: Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- Extras Beat writer for release notes (was: Re: exim-sa (Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-12])
- Re: exim-sa (Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-12])
- Re: exim-sa (Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-12])
- Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
- Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
- Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
- Re: rpms/ez-ipupdate/devel needs.rebuild,1.1,NONE
- Re: rpms/ez-ipupdate/devel needs.rebuild,1.1,NONE
- Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
- Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
- Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
- Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
- Re: Broken dependencies on libsysfs.so.1 ??
- Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
- Re: Broken dependencies on libsysfs.so.1 ??
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Broken dependencies on libsysfs.so.1 ??
- Broken dependencies on libsysfs.so.1 ??
- exim-sa (Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-12])
- [Fwd: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-12]
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-12
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Re: Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder nagmails
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-12
- Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-12
- Re: Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder nagmails
- Re: openmpi
- Attention, packagers! Invalid rebuilds
- Re: openmpi
- Re: openmpi
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder nagmails
- Re: Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder
- Re: Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder
- Re: Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder
- Re: rpms/nmh/devel nmh.spec,1.15,1.16
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder nagmails
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder
- Re: Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder nagmails
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder
- Re: Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder
- Re: Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder
- Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6 reminder nagmails
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-10
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-10
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-10
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: Fedora Lisp website
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: Fedora Lisp website
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Orphaning 'rpmDirectoryCheck' (Tool to detect some RPM packaging errors)
- Orphaning 'mantis' (Web-based bugtracking system)
- Orphaning 'cfs' (Userspace crypto-filesystem)
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2006-09-7
- Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: Monodevelop 0.12-2
- We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Re: FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2006-09-7
- Monodevelop 0.12-2
- Re: FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2006-09-7
- Re: FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2006-09-7
- Re: FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2006-09-7
- Re: FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2006-09-7
- Re: rpms/lineakd/devel lineakd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Re: rpms/lineakd/devel lineakd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Re: rpms/lineakd/devel lineakd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Re: rpms/lineakd/devel lineakd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-09
- Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-09
- Re: Unowned directories
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Any reason arj is not part of extras?
- Re: release number, was Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Unowned directories
- Re: Unowned directories
- remaining Ignacio packages
- PHP SIG
- Re: FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2006-09-7
- Re: Transaction Check Error
- Re: Transaction Check Error
- Re: Transaction Check Error
- Re: rpms/lineakd/devel lineakd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Re: Transaction Check Error
- Re: FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2006-09-7
- Re: Unowned directories
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Unowned directories
- Re: Closing bugs
- Proposal: Conflicts of packages, was: Transaction Check Error
- Re: Closing bugs
- Re: release number, was Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: release number, was Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Closing bugs
- Re: Unowned directories
- Re: Transaction Check Error
- Re: Transaction Check Error
- Re: Transaction Check Error
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Transaction Check Error
- FESCo Meeting Minutes for 2006-09-7
- Unowned directories
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-08
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-08
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-08
- Re: rpms/lineakd/devel lineakd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: rpms/perl-PBS/devel perl-PBS.spec,1.2,1.3
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Correcting directory ownership of /usr/share/omf in Fedora
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: release number, was Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: release number, was Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: release number, was Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- release number, was Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Mass rebuild: Rebuild your packages for fc6
- Re: Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-06
- Re: Christian Iseli's %ghost pyo patrol
- Re: Christian Iseli's %ghost pyo patrol
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-06
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-06
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-06
- Re: Christian Iseli's %ghost pyo patrol
- Re: Closing bugs
- Re: Closing bugs
- Re: Closing bugs
- Re: Closing bugs
- Re: Christian Iseli's %ghost pyo patrol
- Closing bugs
- Re: Christian Iseli's %ghost pyo patrol
- Re: Christian Iseli's %ghost pyo patrol
- Christian Iseli's %ghost pyo patrol
- Re: Fedora Lisp website
- Fedora Lisp website
- Re: Any reason arj is not part of extras?
- Any reason arj is not part of extras?
- Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-09-05
- From: Fedora Extras repoclosure
- Broken upgrade paths in FC+FE 2006-09-05
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-09-05
- Re: nag-mails for not-yet-rebuild packages (Was: Re: Ignacio's packages: status update)
- Re: Housekeeping (Was Re: FE Package Status of Sep 4, 2006)
- Re: Housekeeping (Was Re: FE Package Status of Sep 4, 2006)
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora General Discussion]
[Fedora Art]
[Fedora Docs]
[Fedora Package Review]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite Backpacking]
[KDE Users]