Hi, > OK, this means testing. Obviously it would be best to test packages > for RHEL (and CentOS) by *actually* using them on RHEL (and CentOS) > and seeing what happens. So, how about some sort of arrangement > where: > > maintainers can, if they want to and perhaps per some > approval process, get a no-cost RHEL licence in return > for doing the normal maintainer testing, debugging, etc. > for (some of?) their package(s) on RHEL. Again, the problem is not so much if it works and works happily under RHEL/CentOS, but the QA/QC expected of a commercial product. Me, I am happy to have the no-cost RHEL licence, a copy of the distro and some RedHat freebies (come on, there has to be something!), but would be looking at some form of indemnification from RH should something get through which causes problems for the commercial client. I don't mind carrying the can for stuff I do in FE, but would have qualms for the RHEL. TTFN Paul -- "Bist Du meine Mutter?" - das leere kind
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
