On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:25:57 +0100 Paul <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Again, the problem is not so much if it works and works happily > under RHEL/CentOS, but the QA/QC expected of a commercial product. > Me, I am happy to have the no-cost RHEL licence, a copy of the > distro and some RedHat freebies (come on, there has to be > something!), but would be looking at some form of indemnification > from RH should something get through which causes problems for the > commercial client. I don't mind carrying the can for stuff I do in > FE, but would have qualms for the RHEL. Hi Paul, I don't understand the "indemnification" bit. But, IANAL. :-) If "EE" becomes a collection of stuff supplied on a "volunteer" and "optional add-on basis" (much the same as FE is currently provided) then why would I or any other volunteer need indemnification? I mean, folks purchase RHEL (and all the related support services, etc.) and "EE" is (or perhaps could be) just a collection of separate volunteer-provided add-ons [that just happen to have been through a community review process and are, as a result, likley to be of good qulaity]. Or am I mis-understanding what "EE" is liklely to become? Ed -- Edward H. Hill III, PhD | ed@xxxxxxx | http://eh3.com/ -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
