On Wednesday 13 September 2006 18:49, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 13/09/06, Laurent Rineau > > <laurent.rineau__fedora_extras@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > During the review of CGAL¹ (bug #199168), a problem was raised by Ralf > > C.: the first version of CGAL-devel was shipping CORE², a dependency of > > CGAL. That library installs its headers into /usr/include/CORE/* and Ralf > > said that the name "CORE" is too general for an inclusion into FE. > > I personally think that Ralf is over reacting. It would be a directory > in /usr/lib (i.e. /usr/lib/CORE) right? I don't see a problem. Well, I agree. At least, if it was "core" (lowercase), I would agree that the name is a bit too general. But, IMO, the uppercase name CORE/ could be accepted in /usr/include/ (and it would be a lot more easier for me to get CORE into FE if I had not to make upstream dev' change the name). We'll see if people here agree with that. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
