On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 17:11 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Well, we didn't talk about this case explicit in FESCo IIRC. But my 2 > cents on the whole issue: > > A kind of AWOL process indirectly was started when the mass rebuild was > announced (that was more then three weeks ago). If maintainers didn't > showe up to rebuild their stuff -> packages considered mostly orphaned > (at least *if* the packager didn't rebuild one of his packages and seems > to be AWOL by common sense -- e.g. no other commits in the past weeks, > no posts on this mailing list and stuff like that). Other people should > be able to take over the packages quickly now in time to get the tree in > shape before FC6. E.g. announce it in the wiki and on the list that you > want to take over a package, wait two or three days, recheck if packager > is still AWOL, take it over. If the packager shows up again in the next > weeks -> give him his package back. I agree. I think maintainers have been given plenty of time to handle rebuilds, and what your suggesting sounds fine to me. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
