On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 21:06 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Chris Weyl schrieb: > > On 9/19/06, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Well, they only get removed from the cvsextras group. We can re-add them > >> easily later at any point without much overhead if we want to. Call that > >> process "'inactive' flag" > > I think the question lurking in the background is: would they need to > > go through the sponsorship process again, or would a "please readd me" > > note to the list do? > > I think it should decided on a case-by-case basis. Hmm, I don't see any reason for doing this. > If ignacio, mpeters > or some trusted redhat people show up again with a good explanation why > they were AWOL -> just re-add then. In other cases -> sponsorship. IMO, it should simply be: "AWOL and you're out" (Less aggressively formulated "Your account has expired"). For well-reputed packagers, it should not be much of a problem to pass through the accounting process quickly again. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
