Peter Gordon wrote:
Using your same reasoning, we have validity then in naming the project"RHEL Extras" or similar.
The danger is that it implies it is supported somehow by RH. I doubt RH will want this.
Perhaps it should be "Prominent North American Linux Vendor's Enterprise Distribution-based Extras" ;)
Tim -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list