On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:46:19 +0200, Michał Bentkowski wrote: > Hi! > Recently I decided to split my kadu package to kadu and kadu-theme. > Before, themes were made by kadu spec and they were updated each time > I released new kadu version - it was unnecessary. To avoid these not > needed updates themes are now created by separate spec. > But now there is a problem with yum update. > `yum update kadu` causes following message: > Error: Missing Dependency: kadu = 0.5.0-0.7.20060808svn.fc5 is needed > by package kadu-theme-nuvola16 > Error: Missing Dependency: kadu = 0.5.0-0.7.20060808svn.fc5 is needed > by package kadu-theme-emots > But never versions of them are available in repo, `yum list kadu-theme\*` > Installed Packages > kadu-theme-crystal16.x86_64 0.5.0-0.7.20060808svn. installed > kadu-theme-crystal22.x86_64 0.5.0-0.7.20060808svn. installed > kadu-theme-emots.x86_64 0.5.0-0.7.20060808svn. installed > kadu-theme-gg6_compatible.x86_64 0.5.0-0.7.20060808svn. installed > kadu-theme-glass16.x86_64 0.5.0-0.7.20060808svn. installed > kadu-theme-glass22.x86_64 0.5.0-0.7.20060808svn. installed > kadu-theme-nuvola16.x86_64 0.5.0-0.7.20060808svn. installed > kadu-theme-nuvola22.x86_64 0.5.0-0.7.20060808svn. installed > Available Packages > kadu-theme-crystal16.noarch 0.5.0-2.fc5 extras > kadu-theme-crystal22.noarch 0.5.0-2.fc5 extras > kadu-theme-glass16.noarch 0.5.0-2.fc5 extras > kadu-theme-glass22.noarch 0.5.0-2.fc5 extras > kadu-theme-nuvola16.noarch 0.5.0-2.fc5 extras > kadu-theme-nuvola22.noarch 0.5.0-2.fc5 extras You've switched from non-noarch to noarch (or vice versa), which confuses package resolvers (why exactly, I always forget - but it would make sense if it were because both package types could coexist nicely). This is a thing packagers should avoid like the plague. I get the same broken deps on i386 when I run sudo yum install kadu-theme-nuvola16 but no such problems when I do sudo yum install kadu-theme-nuvola16.noarch What I can do at the repository level is to get rid of any old non-noarch rpms. I believe that is enough to "fix" it. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
