On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 09:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Paul Howarth wrote: > > I also note that packages un-owning /usr/share/omf will need to add a > > dependency on scrollkeeper for the directory ownership; many of the > > affected packages will currently only have scriptlet dependencies on > > scrollkeeper. > > > > Indeed, and I wonder of we really want a dependency on scrollkeeper in > this packages, then we could argue that all packages containing html > docs should have a dependency on htmlview, etc. > All packages using scrollkeeper should already have: Requires(pre): scrollkeeper Requires(postun): scrollkeeper These dependencies will keep scrollkeeper installed for the life of the package. So there is no need for a plain Requires: scrollkeeper. > Wouldn't it be better to but shared dirs like this into the filesystem > package? The same goes for /usr/share/applications (On FC5) $ rpm -qf /usr/share/applications |grep filesystem filesystem-2.3.7-1.2.1 > and > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/XxX/apps > (On FC5) hicolor-icon-theme owns these directories so anything installing files here should Require: hicolor-icon-theme. hicolor-icon-theme is a package of directories similar to filesystem. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
