On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 12:43 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > I would like to suggest the following plan for Enterprise Extras: > > > > 1) There are 4 channels per {Scientific/Centos} Enterprise Linux > > extras > > extras-devel > > extras-testing > > extras-updates > > Frankly, *way* too much complexity here. Heck, we don't even have > a -testing repo for FE yet. When/if we figure out -testing for *all* of > Extras, then EE will naturally benefit from it as well. > > At least at first, I'd strongly recommend following usual Extras rolling > Release policy for EE as well. FYI, FESCo decided to call this EPEL (Extras Packages for Enterprise Linux) per yesterday's meeting. And we discussed EPEL quite a bit yesterday. The minutes should be available at some point. josh -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list