Hans de Goede wrote: > I still see no resolution or any solution in sight for the fact that > most packages which currently own /usr/share/omf don't require > scrollkeeper and that thus scrollkeeper owning /usr/share/omf now isn't > any help at all, and thus all the filed bugs are a bit bogus. It's not necessarily that the bugs aren't bogus, it's just not immediately clear what the best fix/resolution is for packages that don't Requires: scrollkeeper. -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list