Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Sun, 2006-09-10 at 15:57 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: >> For example, I currently do not use RHEL or any of its no-cost derivates, so I >> would be quite unable to support Scribes or Openbox or other of my packages on >> it. But, say that John Doe Contributor actively used RHEL at home and at his >> workplace (due to its warranty support via paid-for contractual obligations), >> and he really liked Scribes. Could he go through the new contributor process and >> whatnot and maintain just the RHEL branch(es)? >> > This is the plan. Currently, people can be co-maintainers but the > infrastructure to assign separate people to bug reports on different > branches, let certain maintainers have write access to a subset of a > package's branches, etc does not exist. So there's nothing stopping you > from sharing your packages with another packager, but there's some > features which will make it better in the future. Great. That clarified things a lot for me. Thanks for your explanation. :) -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
