Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-09-10 at 15:57 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
> For example, I currently do not use RHEL or any of its no-cost derivates, so I
> would be quite unable to support Scribes or Openbox or other of my packages on
> it. But, say that John Doe Contributor actively used RHEL at home and at his
> workplace (due to its warranty support via paid-for contractual obligations),
> and he really liked Scribes. Could he go through the new contributor process and
> whatnot and maintain just the RHEL branch(es)?
> 
This is the plan.  Currently, people can be co-maintainers but the
infrastructure to assign separate people to bug reports on different
branches, let certain maintainers have write access to a subset of a
package's branches, etc does not exist.  So there's nothing stopping you
from sharing your packages with another packager, but there's some
features which will make it better in the future.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux