Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 22:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Is there any reason why arj (the clasic archiver) is not part of FE? >> See: http://arj.sourceforge.net/ > [...] >> I'm asking because if there isn't any reason then I will probably >> package arj. > > In case you do, I have a local not-really-used package of it - feel free > to grab it if you find something useful there: > http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/arj-3.10.22-0.2.src.rpm > > > Thanks, It was a good start, if you're interested the FE review request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205878 Regards, Hans -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
