Michael Schwendt schrieb: > On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 11:46:51 +0200, Christian Iseli wrote: > >> On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 11:32:40 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: >>> If possible, please recreate this list based on packages in the >>> repository and not based on the needs.rebuild files. >>> Despite an earlier warning, some packagers still rebuild their packages >>> without increasing "Release". :( >> How will I know, when the needs.rebuild file has been removed, if one >> of EVR was actually increased ? > time-stamp of the binary rpms c4chris, that's what I used during the last rebuild to find those packages that were not rebuild. I used some crappy script for that. I'll send them to you, maybe it helps. >> And how do I distinguish those from packages where the maintainer >> chose not to rebuild the package for some reason ? > We're interested in all such cases anyway, aren't we? > (especially non-noarch packages) +1 CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
