Re: FYI: list of extras contributors that didn't rebuild a single package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Sonntag, den 17.09.2006, 17:37 +0200 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
> Hi,
> 
> I had a quick look at the extrs/devel repo *without* the needsign repo
> (does anyone know why
> repoquery -a --repoid=<foo> --archlist="src"
> doesn't work for the needsign repo?). In other words: stuff that happend
> in the past one or two days is missing.
> 
> Anyway, it seems that the following packagers didn't rebuild a single
> package:
> 
> aaron.bennett_AT_olin.edu -- 1 packages
> ankit644_AT_yahoo.com -- 1 packages
> anvil_AT_livna.org -- 1 packages
> bluekuja_AT_ubuntu.com -- 2 packages
> byte_AT_fedoraproject.org -- 5 packages
> coldwell_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> danken_AT_cs.technion.ac.il -- 6 packages
> davidz_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> extras-orphan_AT_fedoraproject.org -- 5 packages
> folkert_AT_vanheusden.com -- 1 packages
> gijs_AT_gewis.nl -- 2 packages
> hamzy_AT_us.ibm.com -- 4 packages
> harald_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> i.pilcher_AT_comcast.net -- 1 packages
> ivazquez_AT_ivazquez.net -- 12 packages
> jdennis_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> jgarzik_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> jonathan.underwood_AT_gmail.com -- 4 packages
> joost_AT_cnoc.nl -- 1 packages
> jvdias_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> jylitalo_AT_iki.fi -- 1 packages
> karsten_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> llch_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> markmc_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> matteo.ricchetti_AT_libero.it -- 1 packages
> mccann0011_AT_hotmail.com -- 3 packages
> michel.salim_AT_gmail.com -- 7 packages
> mpeters_AT_mac.com -- 18 packages
> noa_AT_resare.com -- 1 packages
> nomis80_AT_nomis80.org -- 3 package
> oliver.andrich_AT_gmail.com -- 1 packages
> otaylor_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> P_AT_draigBrady.com -- 1 packages
> petersen_AT_redhat.com -- 10 packages
> pvrabec_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> qshen_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> qwang_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> robert_AT_marcanoonline.com -- 5 packages
> roozbeh_AT_farsiweb.info -- 14 packages
> shahms_AT_shahms.com -- 14 packages <- ignore this one, seems he rebuild
>   them yesterday
> tamaster_AT_pobox.com -- 1 packages
> toth_bandi_AT_users.sourceforge.net -- 1 packages
> woodard_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages
> 
> 43 Contributors -- 15 of that use a redhat.com address :-/
> 
> Has anyone see those two:
> mpeters_AT_mac.com -- 18 packages
> roozbeh_AT_farsiweb.info -- 14 packages
> They were both quite active in Fedora in the past but they seem to be
> vanished
> 
> CU
> thl
> 

I expect the mailing list has too much traffic for the developers above
to know about the rebuild.

Perhaps adding an additional low traffic mailing list for non-noisy
announcements such as the "please rebuild your packages" announcement,
or mailing each developer individually, i.e. not through a mailing list,
would get rid of this problem.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux