Re: repo layout for EPEL (Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:

Also, one point we need to still keep in mind is that *all* of these packages have already seen light+life on FedoraCore{something}, and there isnt any testing-repo there, so its pretty much anyone using the pkg, and doing his/her yum updates regularly, like every good child should, has been eaten/bitten/suckered by most of the bugs. { or do I live in false hope ? }

Fedora Core has a testing repository. Fedora Extras and EPEL should have one too. Nobody uses the testing repository, so we will skip that process is a lame idea.


I agree, on the point of a testing repository. What I was trying to say, perhaps not clearly enough, was that since these packages would have already seen action via the FedoraExtras repo's, the criteria setup for moving from Testing to Stable repo's should take that into consideration.

- KB
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux