On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:01:46AM +0530, Rahul alleged: > Ville Skytt? wrote: > > > > >By the way, I don't have the impression that packagers are expected to > >make sure that upgrades like directly from FC(x) to FC(x+2) without > >stopping at FC(x+1) do work in the first place. Other opinions? > > > > We definitely need to make sure that works. Many uses skip releases > because they dont want to upgrade so soon and they didnt find any > benefits in the latest release or there are some regressions and things > like that. Upgrade paths to newer releases should always be as smooth as > possible (not just between x and x+2). Ditto. All upgrade paths should work correctly. -- Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator University of Southern California
Attachment:
pgpgDC8rMSFbV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
