Robert Marcano schrieb: > On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 17:37 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > I think that your method to retrieve this list has problems, I increased > the relase, removed the needsrebuild file and did the rebuild, for > example see > > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/eclipse-subclipse/devel/?root=extras&only_with_tag=eclipse-subclipse-1_1_5-2_fc6 > > I was one of the first to do the rebuild because I was online when the > needsrebuild files commits began to appear on my Inbox Yeah, sorry, didn't get the exact time on the first run -- some of those packagers that were really fast might have fallen trough the test wrongly (like you). Here is an updated list one: aaron.bennett_AT_olin.edu -- 1 packages ankit644_AT_yahoo.com -- 1 packages bluekuja_AT_ubuntu.com -- 2 packages byte_AT_fedoraproject.org -- 5 packages coldwell_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages davidz_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages extras-orphan_AT_fedoraproject.org -- 5 packages folkert_AT_vanheusden.com -- 1 packages gijs_AT_gewis.nl -- 2 packages harald_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages ivazquez_AT_ivazquez.net -- 10 packages jdennis_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages jgarzik_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages jvdias_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages jylitalo_AT_iki.fi -- 1 packages markmc_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages matteo.ricchetti_AT_libero.it -- 1 packages michel.salim_AT_gmail.com -- 7 packages mpeters_AT_mac.com -- 18 packages noa_AT_resare.com -- 1 packages nomis80_AT_nomis80.org -- 3 packages oliver.andrich_AT_gmail.com -- 1 packages otaylor_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages P_AT_draigBrady.com -- 1 packages petersen_AT_redhat.com -- 10 packages pvrabec_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages qshen_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages qwang_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages roozbeh_AT_farsiweb.info -- 14 packages tamaster_AT_pobox.com -- 1 packages toth_bandi_AT_users.sourceforge.net -- 1 packages woodard_AT_redhat.com -- 1 packages CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
