On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 11:31 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rex Dieter (rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Offhand, I couldn't disagree more. You mean you'd rather live with the bugs > > that those 100+ package updates fix? No thanks. If you don't want the > > churn, then don't update your el4 boxen. > > So, you're requiring the user to explicitly browse the updates for > security vs. non-security fixes, for example? With the updateinfo.xml metadata that core is generating, this could be addressed with a simple addition to the update/repo tracking tools on the user's side. That assumes, of course, that that data is generated for extras ;) David -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
