Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:12:14PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:30:02AM -0500, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> > Even if I had stayed with 1.2.X packages there would have been problems
> > coexisting with the atrpms repository...
> 
> Why? This only happens if you ignore that these packages exist
> and are used by a large number of people.

No answer on this one?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpFGK5bXgq0v.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux