On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 23:18 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:12:14PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:30:02AM -0500, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote: > > > Even if I had stayed with 1.2.X packages there would have been problems > > > coexisting with the atrpms repository... > > > > Why? This only happens if you ignore that these packages exist > > and are used by a large number of people. > > No answer on this one? If atrpms and FE both have asterisk packages it would be difficult to use both repos at the same time. In any case, the fact that a package exists in another repo is not a good enough reason to keep it out of FE. Jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
