On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 12:56 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:36:23PM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > > Axel Thimm wrote : > > > > > Sorry, but I miss the humor in this, and I'm busy fixing broken stuff > > > to get further into this. > > > > Well, don't think just about the present, think about the long term : > > You'll also be getting annoying reports about overriding Extras > > packages regarding libpri, zaptel and asterisk, and the usual bad > > publicity that accompanies it :-( > > We'd be all much better off if it can be avoided! > > > > To avoid this you could have submitted your packages for Extras > > inclusion, but it's too late now. What you can do is : > > When I offered it was said that zaptel is dead-before-review and > the rest due to being dependent as well. Zaptel would still be dead-before-review except for the fact that Digium has recently become more open to getting the Zaptel kernel modules into Linus' kernel tree. > > 1) Try to pause the asterisk inclusion into Extras until further > > discussion happens (i.e. someone answers the "Why a beta?") I went with the 1.4.0 betas because they are much easier to package without ugly specfile hacks, which were objected to earlier in the review process. They are also pretty solid codewise despite the "beta" appellation. > No, I'm not going to battle this, and there is no way to "pause" this, > after someone's "go" it's was blitz-reviewed and pushed into the repo > in lightning speed - I wish my FE packages would slide in like that. zaptel and libpri were not "blitz reviewed". The review requests have been in bugzilla since January of 2006. The first 1.4.0 beta SRPMS for zaptel were put up for review on October 12th and were imported into CVS on October 14th. The first 1.4.0 beta libpri SRPMS were put up for review on October 13th and were imported on October 14th as well. The asterisk package is still under review. I've seen many other package reviews happen in shorter time.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
