Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:23:51 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
I'll admit to being in a foul mood, part of which being caused by yet
another message trying to 'fix' the non-broken part of last week's
conflict, and that after a lot of people tried very hard not to feed the
flames by keeping quiet.
A couple of valid questions have been raised. And an upgrade to a beta
release with an approval in less than 24 hours is something that is
broken.
Not necessarily. There can be valid reasons to do so. Major security
problems in the old one can be a valid reason. The old package might
violate some sort of patent or copyright or trademark which has been
fixed in the beta. Probably other reasons, too.
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
