Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Horst H. von Brand wrote:
Christopher Stone <chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[..]

I *think* the point he is trying to make is that some people don't
like 3rd party repositories overriding Fedora Extras without good
reason and some other people dont like Fedora Extras maintainers
adding packages in Fedora Extras without first consulting with the 3rd
party repositories.

Ludicrous. That would give *third* parties, unrelated ones at that, a sort
of veto power.

+1.

It seems to me if a conflict exists between FE and a third-party repo, this is by definition the problem of the 3rd party repo maintainer, since nothing was preventing him/her to either submit the conflicting package into FE in the first place, or at least review the FE submission.

And on the subject of a wiki page with available 3rd party repositories, it certainly should only contain repos that are *designed* to be add-on repos over FC and FE, in that order.

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux