On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 12:36:49PM -0500, Michel Salim wrote: > Would it make sense to have redhat-lsb installed in mock? My > understanding is that the LSB specifies files that any Linux system is > expected to have, so it should not be necessary to have to > BuildRequire on them. OS versions that claim to be LSB-certified at a given level may have those, and they may be provided by a set of RPMs that are not included in the base distribution. redhat-lsb "Provides: lsb", so any LSB-compliant app can "Require: lsb". LSB is really no different than any other set of dependencies, except that they aim for wider cross-distro compatibility. I don't see a strong reason to put them in the default buildroot, just buildrequire them if needed at build time. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
