On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 20:17 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Monday, 23 October 2006 at 19:50, Callum Lerwick wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 10:59 +1000, Norman Gaywood wrote: > > > Another article and discussion of interest is "Who maintains RPM?", > > > posted in August 2006. > > > > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/196523/ > > > > After reading that, > > That article is biased and inflammatory. Can we please stop quoting it? > > > and especially this[1], can we *PLEASE* put our foot > > down, show some balls, take the lead, show some initiative, and fork the > > "Fedora Package Manager"? > > What about "working with upstream"? I thought that was one of the main Fedora > goals. > > > Jeff Johnson isn't fit to maintain Evolution. > > Why are doing this? Stop flaming, please. > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119185 > > Oh, for crying out loud, stop bringing up two year old bugs that have > long been resolved. This is not helping. It's resolved in upstream rpm 4.4.5; Fedora is stuck with 4.4.2 and so it doesn't look resolved to me (and I see no sign of a backported fix for this in the Fedora rpm changelog). Which is one of the issues that this thread was raised about. Paul. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
