On Monday, 23 October 2006 at 19:50, Callum Lerwick wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 10:59 +1000, Norman Gaywood wrote: > > Another article and discussion of interest is "Who maintains RPM?", > > posted in August 2006. > > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/196523/ > > After reading that, That article is biased and inflammatory. Can we please stop quoting it? > and especially this[1], can we *PLEASE* put our foot > down, show some balls, take the lead, show some initiative, and fork the > "Fedora Package Manager"? What about "working with upstream"? I thought that was one of the main Fedora goals. > Jeff Johnson isn't fit to maintain Evolution. Why are doing this? Stop flaming, please. > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119185 Oh, for crying out loud, stop bringing up two year old bugs that have long been resolved. This is not helping. Have you actually tried to talk to Jeff without prejudice? It's impossible and improper to judge someone based on one feral bugreport. Regards, R. -- Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski MPlayer developer http://rpm.greysector.net/mplayer/ "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
