On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 20:17 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Monday, 23 October 2006 at 19:50, Callum Lerwick wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 10:59 +1000, Norman Gaywood wrote: > > > Another article and discussion of interest is "Who maintains RPM?", > > > posted in August 2006. > > > > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/196523/ > > > > After reading that, > > That article is biased and inflammatory. Can we please stop quoting it? > > > and especially this[1], can we *PLEASE* put our foot > > down, show some balls, take the lead, show some initiative, and fork the > > "Fedora Package Manager"? > > What about "working with upstream"? I thought that was one of the main Fedora > goals. > > > Jeff Johnson isn't fit to maintain Evolution. > > Why are doing this? Stop flaming, please. > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119185 > > Oh, for crying out loud, stop bringing up two year old bugs that have > long been resolved. This is not helping. > > Have you actually tried to talk to Jeff without prejudice? It's impossible > and improper to judge someone based on one feral bugreport. Hell, I wrote that response *before* I saw his little exchange with spot, just today. I stand by my GPG signed assessment. In two years his, shall we say, "interpersonal skills" have not matured one bit. I've had to deal with way too many people like him. Its not going to get better. He doesn't even seem to have the saving grace of irreplaceable technical skill. He's not an upstream worth dealing with. My worthless rabble vote is to just admit to ourselves we've forked already, cease contact with Jeff, and end the drama once and for all. Then fix RPM's crappy DB locking. IANARHE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
