Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:11:00 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:14:58 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 21
jd-1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc6
This is strange because the rpm I built for FE-devel is
jd-1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc7, not .fc6.
You forgot to "cvs up" your "common" directory. As a result, you've
submitted a .fc6 build request for development, resulting in _two_ (!)
src.rpms and .fc7 binary rpms:
I'm going to re-push the following build-job results for FE development
after removing the .fc6 src.rpms manually:
dnsmasq/2.34-2.fc7
eggdrop/1.6.18-4.fc7
gaim-gaym/0.96-3.2.289svn.fc7
highlight/2.4.8-1.fc7
imlib2/1.3.0-1.fc7
jd/1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc7
libburn/0.2.2-2.fc7
libopts/27.4-1.fc7
qstat/2.10-6.fc7
ren/1.0-11.fc7
testdisk/6.5-1.fc7
Thank you for pointing what is a problem.
Well, I was just planning to queue jd/1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc7.1
(with common directory updated), but isn't it necessary?
Mamoru Tasaka
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
