Rex Dieter schrieb: > Axel Thimm wrote: >> Perhaps FE needs a testing section (many other repos have such >> stability sections, e.g. "updates" has, kde-redhat has, ATrpms has, >> freshrpms has and fedora.us also had). > uh huh. +1 :) That topic came up in a FESCo-discussion some days ago. The consensus was to have one afaics (I'm all for it as some of you know from past discussions). But there is yet nobody that's working on it (and some people in past discussions didn't like the "testing" repo idea to much iirc). Any volunteers? Side note: The question is also: Should we really start on this now? Or should we try to get the other major things mostly done first (co-maintainership, new VCS, EPEL, ...) fist, before we work on yet another big problematic topic? Having to many things on the plate might not be the best. Further: There is also the "Core and Extras merge" on the horizon that everyone (including me here) mentions. But that's just a rough idea until now and there are no real plans yet (at least none that I've heard of). But that "merge" has certain implications for Extras: Will we stick to the rolling releases? Or something similar to Core now with a updates and a updates-testing repo? Or a mixture? In other words: Is it worth working on a Extras testing repo now before those things are sorted out? To answer my own question: I don't think it is. But we probably should do it together with the merge (or at least calculate it in) CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
