On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:13:15PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:41:58 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Thursday 26 October 2006 10:26, Matthias Saou wrote: > > > > On the other hand, I'm not aware of any > > > > benefits from adding X-Fedora to every desktop file... > > > > > > This has always seemed like a useless fedora.us leftover to me. > > > > I thought it was used in how the Gnome menus are actually setup in Fedora, but > > upon closer look (and discussing with our desktop folks) X-Fedora is 100% > > useless. > > X-Red-Hat-Extras is useless, too. Does that make it a "useless Red Hat > leftover"? > > It is widely known that X-Fedora has never served any purpose other than > allowing for a future desktop menu editing feature. > > At one time, only X-Red-Hat-Base was needed to make a menu entry appear in > the top-level menus, whereas everything else only appeared in the > sub-menus. I remember that there was even some kind request by Red Hat to not use some of these and mangle the top-level menus, but I cannot put my finger on it now. Probably RH7.3-RH9 era. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpD6HnmBOhUA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
