On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 09:58 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thursday 26 October 2006 07:52, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > > > Still, the question is whether to fix desktop-file-install or our > > > spec files? > > > > For now I don't know. If fedora want to use "Application" or "X-Fedora" > > category, desktop-file-utils should be fixed, otherwise all desktop files > > using these categories should be fixed. "Application" has not been a standard category in a long time, but rejecting X-* is clearly a bug. On the other hand, I'm not aware of any benefits from adding X-Fedora to every desktop file... > I spoke to the maintainer of the package, it will be fixed to accept the X-Foo > tags again. Hopefully it will be fixed today for tonight's rawhide push. Thanks, I wish I'd read that 15 minutes ago :P https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212350 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
