On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:54:04 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > Ville Skyttä wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 03:17 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > >> Michael Schwendt wrote: > >>> Package needs work. See bottom of build log: > >>> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=20286 > >>> > >> Well, this is due to desktop-file-install change (0.10->0.11). > >> desktop-file-install 0.11 no longer accepts like X-Fedora or > >> X-RedHat-Base... > > > > Huh, really? That would sound like a bug in desktop-file-install to me. > > > > http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/ar01s03.html > > Well, this is real. You can check this by: > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/20286-jd-1.8.0-0.2.beta061023.fc7/ppc/build.log > Please see the bottom line of this log. > > Mamoru Still, the question is whether to fix desktop-file-install or our spec files? The build.log only says that either this is the new and expected behaviour or there is a bug in d-f-i. Does desktop-file-validate give the same output? -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
