Matthias Saou wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote : > >> Just to make my point clear: I'm ranting for FE breaking ATrpms, of >> course, but even for active ATrpms-agnostics there should be one very >> important issue: Why package beta software, when you don't have to, >> and why shove it right into productive repos? This just lowers the >> quality of the repo as a total. I for one am extremely conservative >> with my own packaging in FE, and I think most people here do so the >> same to keep the QA standards high. > > Then ask the right question to the right person : Ask the zaptel, > libpri and asterisk packages owner why he made such a decision. Note > that in your first email you write : yup. bugzilla good. mailing list flames bad. -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
