On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:15:24AM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Denis Leroy <denis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] > > > And on the subject of a wiki page with available 3rd party > > repositories, it certainly should only contain repos that are > > *designed* to be add-on repos over FC and FE, in that order. > > If they are listed officially as "compatible with Fedora", what makes them > "less official" than Extras? Better fold the packages into Extras, and be > done with it. Unless they ship packages that Fedora can't/won't ship... in > which case Fedora could end up in legal hot water for telling people how to > break the law/go against the licenses (or at least end up in a very > unconfortable position wrt its own guidelines). This doesn't concern that much packages, and in that case there is livna. > Perhaps it should be made easier to join Extras? I don't think this is the issue. The third party repo maintainers won't certainly have hard time being sponsored. -- Pat -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
