Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Schwendt wrote :

>  * If the src.rpm for a binary rpm in the repository does not exist,
>    where does the binary rpm come from? --> We delete it!
> 
>  * Instead of expiring arbitrary packages based on "number of pkgs found",
>    we expire only src.rpms and clean up the binary rpms based on whether
>    their src.rpms still exist.

Seems like the right approach to me, since the addition and removal of
binary sub-packages is something which is impossible to reliably manage
without looking at the source packages they came from.

I'll all for it, let's just care about the source packages and let all
the binaries get cleaned up based on those.

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 5.92 (FC6 Test3) - Linux kernel 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6
Load : 0.06 0.06 0.02

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux