On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:01:36AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 05:13:12PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Sure.. however for Enterprise stuff... there are different > > expectations for what is wanted than the latest and greatest. I was > > trying to get some discussion before people start having to fix the > > engines after the airplane is in the air.. > > I agree that it's essential to stop the free-for-all package churn that > Extras goes through. It's pretty impressive, but an enterprise extras can't > have 100+ packages updating every week. I don't think that there are so much updates on a given installation. There are many specialized packages in extras, and there is no reason that 100 updates in extras should translate to 100 updates on a real setup. I agree that for enterprise stuff update should be avoided, but as more and more packages enter fedora extras, there will be more and more updates for fedora extras as a whole which don't mean more and more updates for the users. In the long term there will be many updates even if it is only to track serious bugs or very needed functionalities. -- Pat -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
