Re: RPM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, 23 October 2006 at 20:16, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> 
> > Frankly, I'm not interested in those past
> > personal issues, I only care about improving Fedora's packaging tools. So,
> > let me ask again: what *technical* issues prevent rpm-4.4.7 from being
> > adopted in fc-devel/fc7?
> 
> AFAIK, nothing technical (that can't be dealt with anyway).  

That was my impression as well.

> Fact is, many folks have personal/professional problems working with
> jbj/upstream. So, the biggest issue to tackle seems to be maintainership
> and (re)defining upstream.

IOW, we only need someone that has no personal issues with jbj as the
package maintainer for rpm. And, possibly, a separate bugtracker for RPM
itself to keep bugreports against RPM package in Fedora and RPM application
separate. That's one of the problems, AFAIR.

Regards,
R.

-- 
Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski
MPlayer developer         http://rpm.greysector.net/mplayer/
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux