On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 20:37 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Monday, 23 October 2006 at 20:16, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > > > Frankly, I'm not interested in those past > > > personal issues, I only care about improving Fedora's packaging tools. So, > > > let me ask again: what *technical* issues prevent rpm-4.4.7 from being > > > adopted in fc-devel/fc7? > > > > AFAIK, nothing technical (that can't be dealt with anyway). > > That was my impression as well. > > > Fact is, many folks have personal/professional problems working with > > jbj/upstream. So, the biggest issue to tackle seems to be maintainership > > and (re)defining upstream. > > IOW, we only need someone that has no personal issues with jbj as the > package maintainer for rpm. And, possibly, a separate bugtracker for RPM > itself to keep bugreports against RPM package in Fedora and RPM application > separate. That's one of the problems, AFAIR. We don't get to decide who maintains RPM in Fedora Core. That's up to Red Hat. A separate upstream RPM bugzilla would be good though. josh -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
