On Monday, 23 October 2006 at 17:52, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > On Oct 23, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > >On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 08:37:40AM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote: > >>>From: Jeff Johnson <n3npq@xxxxxxx> > >>>To: Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> > >[...] > >>>Now fuck off forever. This is personal. > > > >If it's so personal, can we _please_ keep it off this list? > > > > > > Where does the personal stop and the private begin? That's the issue. > > The reasons for FC not upgrading to rpm-4.4.7 are quite complicated > and are > deeply snarled in my personal affairs. E.g. the Fedora Advisory Board > aoppears incapable of deciding package management issues without > involving me by name. > > I want my name and privacy back, and have taken the steps to do so > this morning. > > Fedora really needs to figure out what they want to do with package > management > without invoking my name. I'm one person, and certainly not > preventing anyone > from doing anything they wish. > > But apologies for too much information. I'm not part of any Fedora > project ... I propose that everyone involved steps back and takes a deep breath. If some people (like Tom and Jeff) cannot deal with each other without name calling then they shouldn't. Frankly, I'm not interested in those past personal issues, I only care about improving Fedora's packaging tools. So, let me ask again: what *technical* issues prevent rpm-4.4.7 from being adopted in fc-devel/fc7? An analysis of potential problems has already been done and link posted earlier in this thread. Regards, R. -- Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski MPlayer developer http://rpm.greysector.net/mplayer/ "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
