On Monday 06 November 2006 13:51, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 06 November 2006 14:35, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > re Fedora Legacy Updates for FC3 and FC4 active in the Fedora Extras > > buildsys or not? > > > > Here, ppc is missing: > > > > http://download.fedoralegacy.org/fedora/4/updates/ yes the buildsystem is using legacy. i populated the ppc tree with fc4 updates. but everywhere else the tree is from legacy. > > Is one supposed to enable Fedora Core Released Updates in addition to > > Fedora Legacy Updates? It seems so (looking at the package > > legacy-yumconf-4-2.fc4.noarch.rpm) > > > > But what does the buildsys do? > > > > (The reason I ask is that I want repoclosure to use the same combination > > of repositories.) > Legacy is not quite yet using the Extras build system. We're working up > toward that. And currently we haven't produced any ppc updates, when we > make the move over, we'd resubmit what we've released for FL4 for ppc > building. > > Things mostly holding us up from moving is an update tool to make use of > the builds that land out of Extras' plague setup. If Luke doesn't envision > this happening anytime soon, we'll need a 'push' system that pushes the > builds back out to legacy staging infrastructure so that Legacy can sign / > push / prepare emails like we're currently doing with our own plague setup. we can make use of extras push scripts or just rsync legacy updates to your existing staging location I guess the main difference between extras and legacy is legacy has one email per package and extras one email per push -- ,-._|\ Dennis Gilmore, RHCE / \ Proud Australian \_.--._/ | Aurora | Fedora | v -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
