On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:39:38 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > Hmm ... ideally the diversion would occur after the signing step, so > that resulting packages would be signed as Fedora Extras packages. > is that practical? With a few changes in the code, yes. Most of it is available already, since the code learnt how to publish entire build-jobs rather than individual rpms. It's just that we don't sign directly in the needsign repository, because the repository would be locked longer (waiting for the pass-phrase to be entered), the metadata would need to be recreated, too, and any file permission issues (or other problems) would cause pending build jobs to fail. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
