Re: Seamonkey

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> ... and since we are working on eliminating the differences between these two
> repositories, it is completely unnecessary to do package movements at this
> point. Where was this discussed anyway?

Look at the fedora-legacy-list archives. RHEL already got Seamonkey as a 
replacement for Mozilla months ago. Now there's yet another set of security 
holes, apparently rated critical (in addition to all the pending ones!). So 
it's urgent to do something about this, waiting for Core and Extras to merge is 
not a good idea. Legacy is going to push Seamonkey as a Mozilla replacement for 
FC3 and FC4, so it only makes sense for FC5 to get the same treatment. FC6 and 
FC7 are NOT affected because they don't ship the vulnerable Mozilla Suite 
1.7.x, so Seamonkey is (AFAIK) not going to move to Core for these releases. 
Ask Michal Jaegermann from Legacy and Christopher Aillon from Core for details.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux