On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:42:11 -0500, Brian Pepple wrote: > I would like to see a mention of "trying to find the maintainer > on alternative email addresses". The maintainer (esp smaller > ones who don't really read the fedora lists actively) might just > have a broken email address, and might not be aware of it. > > This seems to me an unnecessary burden on the FE contributor using the > AWOL policy, and before adding it to the policy I would like to hear > from others on the list. Right. Don't add it. A maintainer, whose email is so broken that all messages end up in /dev/null without bouncing, most likely has lost contact with the project and hasn't received any list-traffic for several weeks either. The least such a maintainer ought to do is to submit bi-weekly queries for new bug reports. The responsibility to keep the important bugzilla email address in a working state should be on the maintainer's shoulders. Btw, is subscription of fedora-maintainers still mandatory? -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
