Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:39:53 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
>> If that is all you want then let me apologize, although I'm a fan of the
>>  current review process I'm also a bit allergic to unnecesarry rules.
>> Some people here (and in my memory you are one of them but I could be
>> wrong there) seem to want to add a new/rule procedure for each incident
>> instead of looking at the bigger picture and only create procedures
>> which work for the whole of the bigger picture, and then only if truely
>> necessary.
> 
> Wow, thanks for the flowers. :-/
> 
> Sounds like FUD and nothing else than a personal insult.
> 

As said my memory could be serving me wrong here, that happens. This is
nothing personal. I'm trying to fight the tendency in FE to sometimes
create to many rules / procedures, I've got nothing against you personal.

> If you've ever had reason to disagree with me, you should have opened your
> mouth at the best opportunity. Right now I have no idea what "incidents"
> an proposals you refer to. All I can tell is that I find your sweeping
> statement impolite and inappropriate.
> 

I'm sorry to hear that, this wasn't intended that way.

Regards,

Hans

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux