Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:39:53 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> If that is all you want then let me apologize, although I'm a fan of the >> current review process I'm also a bit allergic to unnecesarry rules. >> Some people here (and in my memory you are one of them but I could be >> wrong there) seem to want to add a new/rule procedure for each incident >> instead of looking at the bigger picture and only create procedures >> which work for the whole of the bigger picture, and then only if truely >> necessary. > > Wow, thanks for the flowers. :-/ > > Sounds like FUD and nothing else than a personal insult. > As said my memory could be serving me wrong here, that happens. This is nothing personal. I'm trying to fight the tendency in FE to sometimes create to many rules / procedures, I've got nothing against you personal. > If you've ever had reason to disagree with me, you should have opened your > mouth at the best opportunity. Right now I have no idea what "incidents" > an proposals you refer to. All I can tell is that I find your sweeping > statement impolite and inappropriate. > I'm sorry to hear that, this wasn't intended that way. Regards, Hans -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
