On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 11:45 -0800, Peter Gordon wrote: > Hi, all. > > I've added obconf, obmenu, and openbox to the "Potential Unmaintained" > category on the Extras/OrphanedPackages wiki page [1]. I no longer > actively use any of these; and I believe that these packages would > benefit from having a new maintainer who does. A couple of people on IRC (#openbox) asked me to clarify this for them, so I'll post it here also to clear up any potential misunderstandings. I see myself as a steward for these packages at this time. I intend to keep them updated and continue to help triage their bugs, etc.; but I feel that a maintainer who actually and actively uses these packages would be more receptive and helpful to these ends. Thanks. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
