Patrice Dumas schrieb: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 07:36:06PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> I don't want to be negative here, nor show disrepect to FESCo members, >>> but I don't think being FESCo members should qualify here. A FESCo member >>> could be there to represent something and not because he has great >>> technical ability to fix packages. >> Well, I think all FESCo members normally should have a "technical >> ability to fix packages". Maybe one time there will be someone in FESCo >> that might not have it, but a FESCo member should be able to know about >> that and leave such work to others. And otherwise yell on the >> mailinglists ;) Errors get made by everyone and can be fixed. > That is true for all the fedora contributors. I can't see why FESCo members > should be treated specially. I thought it's obvious: Because it's their job to keep Extras running and in a good shape. (Site note: I disagree slightly with Ralfs "FESCo is a political organ" statement in this thread. I think FESCo should be more a technical organ that keeps stuff just rolling -- but sure, that involves politics, so he has it's point and it's not worth debating) Nevertheless, I removed that note -- we had two people that disliked it and no one that backed it, it isn't much of and issue now because all FESCo members are sponsors, so I removed it. Find the latest version of the proposal at http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/FixStuffThatNeedsFixing stuff that changed in the past days can be looked at, too: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/FixStuffThatNeedsFixing?action=diff&rev2=5&rev1=3 CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
